The armor, at 81mm, was considerably thinner than the Panther’s and unable to withstand its armor-piercing ammunition.īut the Sherman did have some advantages. Later versions would have an upgraded high-velocity gun, but they would not reach front-line units until late November 1944, five months after the Normandy invasion. They failed to realize that few Shermans would ever last long enough in combat to wear out their barrels. The Sherman’s designers felt that a low-velocity gun would last longer than a high-velocity one. Although it mounted 75mm cannon, it was of a low-velocity type. The M4 Sherman Tanks Had Shortcomings in Design… However, the Panther Committee decided in favor of more conventional engineering and this resulted in the unique Panther design. In fact, early design models of the Panther resembled the T-34 in both looks and layout. The Panther was originally designed to replace the German Mark IV tank in response to the Russian T-34 and KV-1. Its wide steel tracks gave it excellent cross-country performance and reduced ground pressure. The frontal armor was 100mm thick and sloped to deflect shots. Its 75mm high-velocity weapon, while not as powerful as a Tiger’s 88mm, could easily penetrate a Sherman’s hull or turret at all battlefield distances. It had a superior main gun and frontal armor. The Germans knew that their Panther, with its balanced design of firepower, mobility, and crew protection, was their best armored vehicle. The German Panzer-kampf-wagen V (Panther) tank was superior to the American M4 Sherman in almost every respect, but it could not guarantee victory at every encounter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |